
This morning, there was a documentary on SVT about people diagnosed with ADHD. Today, such people are treated with small doses of amphetamine. Even though the dose is about 1/50 what an amphetamine addict takes, the treatment is pretty controversial. Not only ADHD, but many other diagnoses, are treated with medicine, which are classified as narcotics if not prescribed by a doctor.
Why is it so that same chemical substances are considered to be either poison or medicine? Looking at the Swedish and English version of Wikipedia, I’ve found that the definition and classification of narcotic drugs differ between languages. What constitutes the belief that a substance is either something hurtful or something helpful? Is it the side effects, the social effects, or maybe only our current traditions? I would say that it is a difficult question with many legal, ethic and technological considerations to reflect upon. It will, more importantly, be a bigger topic in the future as our medical opportunities expand.

Today, the use of another group of medicine, antidepressants, increases. It is not only used to treat major depressions but also anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, eating disorders, and chronic pain. What is legitimate to treat with medicine? Technology will certainly advance in the future. The question is, will our ethics also change?
No comments:
Post a Comment